Lawyer who raised boys club concerns over judgment accused of misconduct Barristers

Table Of Content

• Charlotte founded a nonprofit, Right to Equality, to advance gender equality.
• I’m a Garrick member. The exclusion of women is the opposite of liberal. It is out of date and wrong
• Interested in instructing DR Proudman?
• Family courts are disturbingly out of touch in dealing with domestic abuse
• Swipe right – find misery and heartbreak. The law must get tough on online dating scams

The father and Cafcass children’s guardian had alleged parental alienation by the mother and asserted there were no safeguarding concerns posed by the father. Third, Dr Proudman represented the mother at a retrial before His Honour Judge Baker where the father alleged parental alienation and the mother alleged abuse. The mother’s allegations of rape and other forms of abuse including to the child were found to be true. Dr Proudman was successful on appeal on behalf of a mother in overturning a fact-finding decision in which no findings were made on the mother’s allegations of rape, domestic abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour. The appellate court also highlighted that the family court does not need to find “intentional misconduct” for a finding of abusive behaviour to be made (§40). The appellate court also held that there is a duty on the court to ensure that there are special measures in place to assist a vulnerable witness to give her best evidence.

Feminist Cambridge academic told to get off her former College's lawn by a student as she posed for a photogra - Daily Mail

Feminist Cambridge academic told to get off her former College's lawn by a student as she posed for a photogra.

Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 07:00:00 GMT [source]

Charlotte founded a nonprofit, Right to Equality, to advance gender equality.

Her dedication to vulnerable clients, particularly those who are victims of abuse, is exemplary”. Cris McCurley, Head of International Family Law, Ben Hoare Bell LLP. A barrister is facing disciplinary proceedings for expressing frustration at the “echoes of a boys’ club attitude” that she claims were in a family court judgment that went against her client. Dr Proudman represented the appellant who appealed the trial judge’s order of nullity on the ground of polygamy.

I’m a Garrick member. The exclusion of women is the opposite of liberal. It is out of date and wrong

Dr Charlotte Proudman represented victim of domestic abuse and controlling behaviour who fled Nigeria with her child. The High Court ordered the return of the child to Nigeria subject to various conditions being met. The mother and the child have applied for asylum and their asylum claim is pending in the first-tier tribunal. Dr Proudman represented the wife at an appeal hearing against refusal to set aside financial remedies order on grounds of lack of capacity and no participatory directions/special measures being in force. The High Court heard the appeal because of “a compelling reason” rather than “a real prospect of success”. As a barrister in immigration and asylum law, I often represent vulnerable clients seeking secure immigration status in the UK due to fear of persecution overseas.

Interested in instructing DR Proudman?

Dr Charlotte Proudman represented children’s relatives whom applied for care, placement and adoption orders to be revoked. Applying for care, placement and adoption orders to be revoked is a very high test to meet. Dr Proudman was instructed on behalf of the children’s family members to make this application on the basis that they had not been thorough assessed by the local authority prior to the final orders being made. “I instructed Charlotte in a complex child abduction case that was appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Family courts are disturbingly out of touch in dealing with domestic abuse

Acid reflux is a condition that affects the opening at the end of your esophagus called the lower esophageal sphincter, or LES. The LES is a muscular opening that keeps food in your stomach and prevents it from refluxing, or moving backward, into the esophagus and throat. When the LES becomes weak or other wise malfunctions, chronic acid reflux can occur resulting in a condition called gastrointestinal reflux disease, or GERD. Acid reflux and GERD can cause symptoms like pain or burning in the upper stomach and lower chest area, hoarseness and sore throat. Proudman has applied to have the case, which is now due to be overseen by another judge who has yet to be named, struck out.

Lawyer who raised ‘boys’ club’ concerns over judgment accused of misconduct

The case involved issues of validity of marriages overseas, the necessity of documentary evidence proving the existence of a marriage and the relevance of expert evidence. Dr Proudman represented the parents of a child at risk of FGM abroad. The court gave guidance that an application for an FGMPO should only be made when the family’s immigration appeal rights have been exhausted. Karon Monaghan QC and Dr Proudman represented the mother in an application for a FGMPO on behalf of her daughter before the President of the Family Division. The President ordered that the family court cannot prohibit the Home Secretary from removing a girl at high risk of FGM from this jurisdiction.

The father sought to rely on sexual footage to show that the parties had consensual sex and the mother was not raped. The mother opposed the admission of such material and argued that it re-traumatised her. For the first time, the Court handed down guidance on the admissibility of intimate material in domestic abuse cases. Following a psychological assessment of the mother, the Court set out thorough participation directions for the mother to ensure she could give her best evidence. The case came before the Court for a preliminary issue hearing after the mother’s appeal of the first fact-finding judgment was allowed. Dr Charlotte Proudman is an award-winning barrister and academic specialising in violence against women and girls.

Dr Proudman represented the mother at a final hearing in an FGMPO case in which the court found that the girl would be at a high risk of FGM if she is returned to Bahrain or Sudan. Dr Charlotte Proudman successfully represented Ms Kate Griffiths MP who sought the publication of the fact-finding judgment published with the names of the father and the mother including only modest redactions. Dr Charlotte Proudman was successful on behalf of Kate Griffiths MP in opposing the father’s application for Mrs Justice Arbthunot to recuse herself. The law in respect of recusal and bias is set out in the judgment. “Charlotte is a strong and skilful advocate who works tirelessly for her clients. She worked extremely hard and was instrumental in achieving an excellent outcome for our client including costs.

The decision made clear that the criminal law definitions of rape and consent do not apply in family proceedings. A failure to evaluate whether there was a pattern of abusive behaviour has profound implications both for the welfare analysis by Cafcass and the court’s final welfare decision. Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother at a fact-finding hearing in which the mother alleged sexual abuse, which was found by the court.

A psychiatric report was prepared and the mother was diagnosed as suffering from an ‘adjustment disorder’ in response to the stressor of domestic abuse. Dr Charlotte Proudman represented two of the four appellant mothers at the substantive appeal hearing. The Court of Appeal handed down general guidance on the family court’s approach to allegations of rape, domestic abuse, and coercive and controlling behaviour. Dr Proudman had successfully applied for permission to appeal, out of time, in three of the four linked appeals, Re B-B, Re H and Re T. Dr Proudman was successful in overturning a consent order in the case of Re B-B in which the mother was coerced to accede to. Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother in a fact-finding hearing before Mr Justice Moor.

'Keep off the grass' is not a sexist remark - Varsity Online

'Keep off the grass' is not a sexist remark.

Posted: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:00:00 GMT [source]

At a further hearing to decide on contact arrangements, there were no participation directions, which meant that the mother could see the father who had raped her. The Judge encouraged the mother to agree contact arrangements directly with the father, her proven rapist. The Judge failed to address PD12J, Part 3A and PD3AA and leading case law. My focus centers on holding perpetrators of male violence against women and girls accountable, a specialization that underlines my commitment to justice and equality. Fearlessly confronting gender bias within the legal system, I have been at the forefront of representing victims of rape, coercive control, and female genital mutilation (FGM). I steadfastly refuse to shy away from confronting the truth, even when speaking it challenges established power structures.

The appeal was allowed, and the order for child contact was set aside. Dr Proudman represented a mother opposing a care order and placement order in respect of her three children. The local authority alleged domestic abuse between the mother and her former partners causing the children harm. The court also found that one of the fathers physically assaulted a child, which constituted non-accidental injury. The court made a number of serious findings relating to domestic abuse and neglect in the family home. The court made a care order and a placement order in respect of the three children.

For over a decade, Charlotte has fearlessly advocated for legal change to advance the rights of women. Along with women’s rights organisations, she has successfully spearheaded campaigns to change the law for women. Charlotte was instrumental in the criminalisation of forced marriage, virginity testing, hymenoplasty and child marriage. Alongside Girls Not Brides, Charlotte campaigned for the age of marriage to increase from 16 to 18 years old. She is a legal advisor to Our Streets Now and Plan UK, a campaign to criminalise public sexual harassment and Bloody Good Period, which aims to make period products freely available in Britain. Charlotte is an advisor to the Vagina Museum and ila, a start-up working to provide safe spaces for victims of abuse.

The judgment provided important guidance on the duties under private fostering arrangements. Charlotte is an award-winning barrister with an extensive practice in complex trials and appellate cases, often encompassing ground-breaking points of law. Ranked as Legal 500’s Leading Junior, Charlotte acts in high value matrimonial finance cases, private law children, child abduction, surrogacy and serious public law children cases.

Acid reflux can cause painful symptoms, and left untreated, chronic disease can cause serious medical issues including cancer. Dr. Sherman helps patients manage acid reflux with state-of-the-art treatment options so they can reduce their risk of serious medical issues and enjoy optimal health. Proudman could face a 12-month suspension of her licence or a fine if found in breach for posting a 14-part thread on X, then called Twitter, in April 2022. It expressed her concerns at the tone of a judgment handed down by Cohen in relation to a family court case. Central to my mission is challenging the systemic biases entrenched within our institutions, with the legal system being a primary focus. Why are women subjected to imprisonment for seeking an abortion while rape goes under-decriminalized?

Mother alleged domestic abuse and emotional harm caused by the father to her and the child. Mother had applied for a fact-finding hearing to determine the disputed allegations and ensure a clear factual matrix for the court, professionals and the parties to work from. During cross-examination of the father, he abandoned his allegations of parental alienation [§57] and the judge found that mother had not alienated the child from the father [§78]. In addition, the judge made a number of specific findings in respect of the parent’s conduct and behaviour from para of the judgment. Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother in a second appeal in the Court of Appeal where allegations of rape were made in private law proceedings.